| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
since we do this here, we no longer need to worry about doing it during initial entry creation, so that's good. that had been on the mental "maybe later" checklist for a while.
the various innovations in entry processing now make it possible to pass
through most of the formatting in hex.e, so that's done now (suffix comments that aren't instruction decodings still need to be made to work)
there's also a new entry type which will be part of the comment parameter system. that's not fully working yet, but this was a bunch of really subtle debugging, so it makes a good spot to checkpoint at.
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I2aff7276368eaad7e5c280a58834605e294dcd74
|
|
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I71930b088c176ade6a0bf7aaecb46bdecb0636ad
|
|
the output is really starting to look like something!
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Ic41c8b1702d884ff89693a86d457af7cc752aa86
|
|
this is necessary because packstring isn't implemented in terms of pack8, unlike packalign
also add a bunch more magic comments to hex.e, which would be in the wrong place without the semantic change
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I422b8d00a07568be5113e005fddaeab82f5ca731
|
|
no comments yet, of course. also no way to run it on evoke itself yet, due to the buffer thing.
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Ia1d7cc06bd3da59a5d272e1c04606c25d46acee5
|
|
also added some instructions it needed
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Ia35280e2696167eb0662a5c3a9dc47840438da56
|