| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
so okay, now all the machine code stuff is implemented and it builds without crashing
the generated executable still crashes though, but this was enough work that it's getting a celebratory check-in
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I201e6912253647da58ef3537c735b478b0dca9fb
|
|
it doesn't work yet, but it's gonna
the reason it doesn't work is that the new helper log-load-variable relies on the assembly-definition words being statically available, and they aren't yet
that's fine though, this is still a huge change, worth checking in. why? well, it represents like 16 hours of debugging which culminated in some very minor changes to the semantics of the label transform, in order to make missing words easier to notice and debug. see comments for details.
woooooo :D
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Id8334819d165ba9e3156ef2bf32008af748eac29
|
|
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I04dd65a9eec71f9b50c8875bdcbe5d4be59888d5
|
|
it doesn't actually output anything, but it all runs without crashing
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I48f2e647044df0ae3db961c747cee31a8826ecf3
|
|
fixed now
also a bunch of small things towards adding a log-load transform
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I6eeb94d896a7e79092886d7b60e9404c31b2ba6f
|
|
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I45662e60c0035758a2cd57d971031eb0562eccb7
|
|
the code doesn't quite run yet, that'll be a future CL
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I71e6a45127c1fc37906d902e36142c17afef2a21
|
|
also some minor cleanup that ie. fixes alignment padding
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Ia8fcb9a44e05e37751cc1b8334aa72add7e62353
|
|
wow! yes. good. now it needs to actually generate label calls :)
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Ide4336e00aa6860fe55c956063303edc873c6d9b
|
|
then it crashes on warm-start because warm-start doesn't exist yet
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I9eba481b31d48f9d32c3790f296204c5c8d90938
|
|
also, add support for ;asm and stuff
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I904bc0c31e7e4c8b0abc7790f3af5d20c275f2a5
|
|
it depended on the execution-model stuff, for the "next" macro. in general, any word implemented in assembly will depend on that. so, the execution stuff is moved into its own file, leaving evoke.e with only the job of bringing everything together. that's a little disappointing because talking about the execution model seems like a good introduction to the whole topic, but perhaps the problem can be solved down the line with literate programming...
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Ic2fe22dcc39980ef75763ae293e41024abc8ba38
|
|
oops - the last CL was supposed to fix this, but it was inadvertently left out
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: I4edf5abed315bea51abcd98ad67cd28782a62efe
|
|
Force-Push: yes
Change-Id: Icf69cdfe7cf31fda07031bbc848c3ce2acb8cca1
|